I had been looking on the internet to give myself a clearer idea of how to shoot the next set of features/skin photographs, and came across this
https://rickfoto.wordpress.com/tag/skin/page/2/
I would definitely like to do some similar work to the darker, more low key photographs mostly around collar bones, necks and chests. I think that will be what I do next. This is something similar to what I would like to create. I will likely shoot it in the studio with a single light with a soft box attached to really soften the skin, whilst creating a nice low key image, which has a good amount of shadows to create definition on the skin.
If I had willing models, I'd be tempted to look into doing some photographs like the nude ones featured on the link. I think with nude photography, It's a very fine line between art and pornography, so it's something that will take a lot of planning to avoid being tacky, meaningless snapshots of naked men and women, and focus more on a meaningful artistic approach to the subject. Being nude is the most natural a person can be, so it's definitely something that would fit in to my work, and something I'll take into consideration.
If I was to photograph nude models, I'd like to do something like this. This focusses more on the openness of the skin, and the fact that it is uncovered in my opinion. Although the photograph is quite flat in places, there is a really good range of grey tones on the body, due to the position of the light.
Whereas the kind of stuff I'd like to avoid is not artistic, there's no point to it, it's just a naked woman. I think it's really easy to cross the art/porn line from looking at a lot of photography, lots of work ends up just being snapshots to draw in the attention of the narrow minded, as a posed to the photograph above.
Helmut Newton is a good example of this, his work constantly goes back and forth on the metaphoric line. Some of Newton's work is stunning, whereas some seems like it's over rated because it's his name on it.
This is an example of one of the better photographs made by Newton. I really like how the background is mostly black, which instantly draws the attention to the brightness of the model's face. I love the range of grey tones on the model's face and body, and how she seems completely focused on something else rather than the man.
Whereas this is one of his worse pieces. It seems really pointless, and it's nowhere near as well shot as the first one. I really like the tones on the model's body, and the contrast between the hair and skin, aesthetically it's really good, and well put together. I think Newton is really inconsistent with his work, he'll produce something fantastic then something quite the opposite, mainly because it seems less artistic and meaningful.
These are some areas I could consider looking into
http://science.nationalgeographic.com/science/photos/skin/#/skin-substitute_1206_600x450.jpg
It includes skin tones, freckles, albinos and henna (which I could also use more tattoos). Instead of photographing skin in general, I could focus more on sets of these specific subjects.
I could shoot more portraits like this, as well as shooting close up macro shots of skin. Using a higher contrast highlights and exaggerates things on the skin like freckles, so if I did photograph them, it would be in this way.